Reid: Nuclear Option Process Starts Tomorrow
by JoelK in AZ
Tue May 17, 2005 at 01:04:23 PM PDT
Reid's email below.
- JoelK in AZ's diary :: Permalink ::
- There's more... (137 comments)

Reid's email below.
http://citizensforethics.org/activities/20050111/
Here are some details:
All post-debate sampling
LVs
Kerry 49
Bush 49
Nader 1
MoE = ?
RVs
Kerry 47
Bush 49
Nader 1
MoE = 4%
Bush approval = 50%
Iraq 51/44 B/K
Economy 44/51 B/K
If someone finds the Internals, please post them.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6161680/site/newsweek/
The emphasis wasn't on substance--the man knew it cold--but on brevity. After each mock debate (Washington lawyer Greg Craig played George Bush), Kerry would sit on the edge of the stage, analyze his performance and hone his answers. Kerry's aides were so confident that they had schooled him in concision that they used his reputation as a windbag to play--and win--an expectations game on debate day. They say they circulated a bogus rumor: they were upset about warning lights on the podiums, fearing their blabbermouth candidate would be bathed in flashing red. In the end, it was Bush--not Kerry--who ran afoul of the strict time limits and earned a blinking light.
First on the spin war that we won:
good news:
Fifteen 15 Florida counties use voting machines that don't create paper copies.
Three judges from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote that the federal judge erred when he threw out the lawsuit filed by U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler, a south Florida congressman.
The date plan: drinks at a local bar and then
off to see a movie then return to the bar for
more drinks, the latter being her idea not
mine. Notwithstanding the political differences
we were having pretty good conversation.
So being a first date we had driven separately,
we left the bar to catch a movie and decided
to meet in front of the theatre. She never
shows! I was stood-up by a complete fool, lol.
If anyone should have done the standing up it
was me.
Anyone disagree with that assessment? I don't.
Since when has playing dirty hurt a republican's
chances of winning? It's time for us to get
down in the mud.
Update [2004-9-1 11:18:6 by JoelK in AZ]: I forgot to include that this was taken from here:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/09/01/kerry_media/index.html
all I can say is OMG. lol.
It is about damn time.
sorry for the swipe but this needs to get around.
Tx. Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes, in a speech, says he got George Bush in the National Guard as a favor to a privileged kid.
The challenge for the Bush campaign is to expand its own base, mobilizing more conservative and Republican voters far more than they have ever been energized before, and turning Kerry into a patently unacceptable alternative. But the dangers of such a strategy are obvious. The more a candidate panders to the party base, the more likely they are to antagonize moderate, independent swing voters. When an incumbent president steps out of the Rose Garden, so to speak, and into the gutter, he loses much of the aura and protection that come with the job. Yet President Bush may have no other alternative.
As Republicans gather in New York, Bush has his work cut out for him. While many observers see national polls that have shown the race roughly tied since early April, it does not mean that the two have equal chances of winning.
Historically, we know that well-known, well-defined incumbents rarely win over many undecided voters on Election Day. With this widely accepted dynamic in mind, this year's pool of undecided voters must look especially daunting to Republican strategists. According to five Associated Press/Ipsos Public Affairs national polls conducted between April and early August, 41 percent of the 3,719 registered voters said that the country was headed in the right direction, to 56 percent who thought the country was on the wrong track. Among the 327 registered voters who were undecided in the presidential race, only 19 percent thought the country was headed in the right direction, while 74 percent said off on the wrong track.
...
At this stage it seems unlikely that a couple months of good economic numbers, a diminished number of U.S. casualties in Iraq that might remove the war from the nation's news headlines, and three strong debate performances would change the structure of a race that in no way resembles what Bush campaign strategists might have anticipated a year ago. Barring a major external event, a major terrorist attack, a well-timed capture of Osama bin Laden, or some other major international development that unifies the country, President Bush will need to be perhaps 3 percentage points ahead going into Election Day, as he is highly unlikely to win over more than, say, a quarter of the undecided vote.
Noticed that Sen. John McCain looks a little pained in his pro-Bush advertisements? Rock star Moby knows why: "I'm best friends with [John's son] Sid McCain. John McCain hates President Bush. He's just doing those ads to help the Republicans." We asked Moby if he'd be protesting the convention. "I'm just going to sit by and watch," he told us. "I'm not hopeful"...
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/225385p-193615c.html
Certainly a blinding glimpse of the obvious but it is nice to hear it confirmed.
No I didn't find a glamor magazine lying around.
So yesterday BushCo04 condemned all 527 ads
regardless of their truthfulness. Given the
opportunity to specifically condemn the SBV's
ads he ducked the question. And of course the
lazy media runs stories like "Bush condemns
swift boat ads."
To me, it feels like 30 seconds of what is
supposed to be a 60 second ad. It starts well
but leaves me hanging.
All in all I'd hafta say this ad is not
impressive to me. I was curious what others
thought.
d'oh!
Get your free Kerry / Edwards bumper sticker
at the following address: